Intolerance Mad Libs.
Last week, Mila Kunis gave an interview in which she revealed that she has a monthly recurring donation going to Planned Parenthood in Mike Pence's name, calling it a "peaceful protest." Not everyone found the story charming though.Read More
Jeff Sessions Didn’t Want Students Exercising Their Free Speech Rights At…His Lecture on Free Speech?
Because everything is a joke now, Attorney General Jeff Sessions, a man who is still prosecuting a woman for laughing at him, was invited to lecture on free speech at Georgetown.Read More
Sarah Huckabee Sanders Wants Jemele Hill Fired Because She Told the Truth About Trump and White Supremacy
ESPN's Jemele Hill tweeted that Donald Trump "is a white supremacist who has largely surrounded himself w/ other white supremacists," and Sarah Huckabee Sanders wants that to be a fireable offense.Read More
Oh Look, It’s Another Guy Who Thinks the First Amendment Means He Can’t Get Fired For Saying Awful Things
Shocker: if you tweet Nazi salutations, your employer is free to fire you.Read More
Tam filed a lawsuit after the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office reject their appeal because of the Lanham Act, which claimed the trademark may "disparage ... or bring ... into contemp[t] or disrepute" any "persons, living or dead." When taken to the Supreme Court, they ruled unanimously in their favor.Read More
What Happened to Freedom of the Press?—Journalist Arrested for Trying to Ask Trump Official a Question
Donald Trump's growing hostility toward the press should sound off some serious alarms.Read More
The FCC is looking into Colbert's joke about Trump's relationship with Putin. Some are crying censorship. Should we be worried?Read More
I've never seen a Pikachu in this intense of a situation before, and I've seen them fight Onix! But here we have a Pikachu dancer whose costume begins to deflate and...well...I mean, I feel like this response is just a leeeetle bit overblown, wouldn't you say?Read More
Allison Janney Rips Into Right-Wing Conspiracy Sites on Samantha Bee’s Not the White House Correspondents’ Dinner
Samantha Bee's star-studded Not the White House Correspondents' Dinner ripped into right-wing conspiracy sites, Fox News' treatment of Bill O'Reilly, and Trump's embarrassing presidency.Read More
During President Obama's live Twitter Q&A in May of 2015, then-CEO of Twitter Dick Costolo ordered employees to deploy an algorithm designed to filter out abusive and harassing replies. But... what about free speech???Read More
The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) has some concerns about a law against revenge porn proposed by Minnesota legislators.Read More
I will defend to the death your right to be properly cited.
The importance of free speech has been a salient and frequent talking point in the cultural zeitgeist for the last few months, so it's more than likely that you've seen somebody tweet or update their Facebook status with the iconic phrase, "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." But do you know where that line actually comes from? Because it sure as hell wasn't Voltaire.Read More
Better be careful what you go around liking on Facebook because according to a recent ruling by U.S. District Judge Raymond Jackson, likes are not protected speech under the First Amendment. The whole case dates back to 2009 when after winning a reelection bid, Hampton Virginia Sheriff B.J. Roberts fired six of his employees who had liked his opponent's page on Facebook. The employees filed suit, arguing that their First Amendment rights were violated. Though you might be inclined to agree, Judge Raymond Jackson does not.Read More
When it comes to Internet activism and Internet discussion of law in general, you're bound to find a lot of people arguing for "freedom." Freedom to do what they want, freedom to say what they want, and freedom to be anonymous about it. Now, you might say (and many do): "That's because they're all a bunch of thieves and bullies who want to keep stealing and bullying." And to an extent, you might be right. The other reason though -- the main reason -- is that basic rights are almost constantly under attack whenever the Internet is involved. Legislators in Arizona, for instance, want to (and think they can) outlaw obscene, lewd or profane language on the Internet, punishable by a $250,000 fine and up to six months in jail. May I suggest you all engage in a bout of self-fornication?Read More
Ladies and gentlemen, the Supreme Court has finally ruled with a 7-2 vote that video games are indeed (awesome? art?) a form of free speech and therefore are protected by the first amendment. The whole mess started way back in 2005 when California passed a law that prohibited the sale of mature-rated video games to minors under penalty of a $1,000 fine. This, of course, was hotly contested on free-speech grounds until it made its way to the Supreme Court and to this final and wonderfully logical conclusion.Ars Technica quotes the decision:
Video games qualify for First Amendment protection. Like protected books, plays, and movies, they communicate ideas through familiar literary devices and features distinctive to the medium. California’s claim that 'interactive' video games present special problems, in that the player participates in the violent action on screen and determines its out-come, is unpersuasive.Read More
Huge news in the realm of social media: The National Labor Relations Board, an independent federal agency charged with safeguarding employees' rights and holding employers accountable for their labor practices, has ruled that employees' use of Facebook is legally protected free speech under many circumstances, even when it expresses negative sentiment about their employers. The ruling came in response to the case of a medical technician named Dawnmarie Souza, who was unhappy that her supervisor would not let her get assistance from a union representative in responding to a customer's complaint. Souza reportedly "using several vulgarities" to mock her supervisor on Facebook and compared him to a psychiatric patient; her co-workers chimed in, leading to "further negative comments about the supervisor." While Souza did all this on her own time and on her own computer, her employer ultimately fired her over these Facebook posts; per the NLRB's ruling, this firing was illegal. The board compared protected speech on Facebook to water-cooler discussion around the office:Read More