Caught yelling at a journalist post the guilty verdict, Russell Brand’s lawyer jumps into damage control mode
Professional duties.
Russell Brand’s barrister has formally reported himself to his professional regulator following a heated confrontation with a journalist just moments after a guilty verdict against the comedian was delivered in court. According to the Daily Express, Ian Winter KC allegedly engaged in a verbal clash with Rosamund Urwin of The Sunday Times outside the Southwark crown court on Thursday November 5, 2026. The incident occurred in view of several other journalists.
The confrontation followed a four-week trial where Brand, 51, was found guilty of rape and three counts of sexual assault. He was cleared of two additional rape charges and one count of attempted indecent assault. During the exchange, Winter reportedly told Urwin, “I hope you are pleased with yourself.” The journalist responded by stating, “I’m pleased justice has been done,” Winter allegedly replied, “Well, it wasn’t. You f****d it.” Winter then added, “Congratulations.”
In a statement released on Friday, Winter confirmed he had reported himself. He noted, “Having seen the ways matters have been characterised in today’s press, I consider my professional duty requires me to self-report those allegations to the Bar Standards Board so the matter can be subject to proper scrutiny. I have made such a report.”
Multiple complaints have reportedly been sent to the regulator
However, the Bar Standards Board maintains a policy of not commenting on whether it has received information regarding potential misconduct by a barrister unless a disciplinary tribunal hearing occurs. Urwin, whose investigative work as a journalist helped bring forward the victims in the case, explained her interaction with the barrister on a podcast.
She stated she approached Winter because her name had been mentioned frequently during the proceedings. “I thought he’s talked about me a lot, I’ll go and introduce myself and that is a legitimate thing to do,” she said. “I was surprised to be confronted and spoken to in that way.”
Ben Taylor, the editor of The Sunday Times, defended his colleague. Taylor labeled the behavior as “reprehensible” and “extraordinary.” He stated, “I have never seen or heard of a barrister behaving in this way.” Taylor further argued that by attacking Urwin’s integrity, Winter was also undermining the jury of eight men and four women who had delivered the verdict.
“By impugning Ros’s integrity, what Mr. Winter is doing, and he should really be called to account for this, he’s impugning the integrity of the entire case. He’s impugning the integrity of a jury, a system that we support massively at The Sunday Times, and we have actually campaigned to protect, who have sat there solemnly and done their duty, and the judge who oversaw the case and everybody else involved. I think what he did was reprehensible.”
The trial itself was marked by significant tension regarding media coverage
Throughout the proceedings, Winter argued that the reporting by The Sunday Times, The Times, and a Channel 4 Dispatches documentary had “poisoned the well.” He claimed this coverage made it impossible for his client to receive a fair trial.
Before the trial began, Brand, through his legal team, even accused the journalists of being “criminals” and suggested their reporting might have constituted the crime of perverting the course of justice. Justice Bennathan, the presiding judge, dismissed these arguments. The judge ruled that the trial could proceed as long as the jury consisted of individuals who had not been influenced by previous media coverage.
This case has also reignited a broader conversation regarding the legal treatment of rape victims. The Guardian reports that during his closing speech, Winter highlighted that none of the complainants had “resisted or screamed or even tried to leave” during their encounters with Brand. This approach drew sharp criticism from various figures.
Claire Waxman, the victims’ commissioner for England and Wales, condemned the reliance on “outdated and harmful assumptions” about how victims should behave. Similarly, Deniz Ugur of the End Violence Against Women coalition described the defense strategy as “appalling.” She noted, “Rape myths like the ones we’ve seen in this case have no place in the courtroom.”
Even law enforcement officials weighed in on the issue
Sir Mark Rowley, the head of Scotland Yard, expressed support for legal reforms to better protect victims from such tactics during trials. He emphasized that there is no single way for a victim to react to trauma, stating, “Some people will fight. Some people will freeze.” He added, “Some people will tell people straight away. Some people bottle it up for years.”
The Ministry of Justice has indicated it will look into proposals to strengthen protections for victims and prevent irrelevant sexual history from being used in court. A government source confirmed that the prime minister, Andy Burnham, believes these calls for reform should be examined.
Meanwhile, the legal fallout continues, with Brand currently in custody and awaiting his sentencing on Monday. Comedian Katherine Ryan also joined the public criticism of the barrister, describing the courtroom incident as “so unprofessional, so inappropriate, so aggressive. Really sickening.”
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
Follow The Mary Sue:
