Trump’s Attempt To Claw Back Billions in Harvard Research Grants Over Antisemitism Claims Just Hit a Brick Wall in a Boston Courtroom
Standing firm.
Donald Trump’s attempt to claw back billions in Harvard research grants over antisemitism claims just crashed into a legal brick wall. A federal judge in Boston dismissed the administration’s lawsuit on August 13, 2026, ruling the case lacked enough evidence to prove Harvard was violating civil rights laws. U.S. District Judge Richard G. Stearns called the incidents cited by the government “too isolated and episodic” to justify cutting off the university’s federal funding.
According to NPR, the lawsuit, filed in March, accused Harvard of failing to protect Jewish students during pro-Palestinian demonstrations that erupted after Hamas’ October 7, 2023, attacks on Israel. The Trump administration claimed Jewish students were “harassed, physically assaulted, stalked, and spat upon” while university officials did nothing.
The government sought to recover billions in federal research grants awarded to Harvard since October 2023. It argued that Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 gave them the right to recoup the money.
The judge wasn’t convinced
Judge Stearns noted most of the incidents occurred during the 2023-24 academic year, with only a few from March 2025. That wasn’t enough to prove a persistent pattern of discrimination. “We disagree with the ruling and are assessing next steps,” said Harmeet Dhillon, assistant attorney general for civil rights at the Department of Justice. Harvard hasn’t commented yet, but the university has previously defended its efforts to combat antisemitism.
This legal battle is just the latest chapter in a long-running feud between Harvard and the Trump administration. The White House has been pressuring the university for months, demanding policy changes in exchange for continued federal funding.
Harvard has pushed back hard, arguing the administration is overstepping its authority and violating the university’s First Amendment rights. Last year, a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to reverse more than $2.6 billion in funding cuts to Harvard, calling the move an “ideologically-motivated assault” disguised as concern over antisemitism.
Harvard isn’t backing down
The university has taken steps to address antisemitism on campus, including forming a task force and reforming its discipline policies. Harvard President Alan M. Garber said the school is committed to making its campus safer for Jewish students. “We care deeply about members of our Jewish and Israeli community and remain committed to ensuring they are embraced, respected, and can thrive on our campus,” Garber said after the lawsuit was filed.
The Trump administration’s case relied heavily on Title VI, which prohibits discrimination based on race or national origin in federally funded programs. But Judge Stearns ruled the government didn’t provide enough evidence to show Harvard was violating the law. The administration pointed to incidents like students being spat on for wearing yarmulkes and being stalked on campus, but Stearns said those cases were too few and too spread out to justify cutting off funding.
Harvard’s legal team argued the lawsuit was just another attempt by the Trump administration to punish the university for refusing to comply with its demands. “This litigation is a continuation of the Government’s ongoing campaign of retaliation against Harvard for refusing to capitulate to government demands and for exercising its First Amendment rights,” Harvard’s attorneys wrote in a filing.
The university has acknowledged past failures in addressing antisemitism but reiterated that it’s taken significant steps to improve. These steps include a 300-page report from its Presidential Task Force on Combating Antisemitism and Anti-Israeli Bias.
This case isn’t just about Harvard
It’s part of a broader push by the Trump administration to reshape higher education by leveraging federal funding. The White House has targeted other universities with similar demands, and while some have complied, Harvard has stood firm. The university’s refusal to bend has made it a focal point in the administration’s campaign to assert control over academic institutions.
For now, Harvard’s federal research grants are safe. But the legal battle isn’t over. The Trump administration is reviewing its options, and if history is any indication, this won’t be the last lawsuit between the two sides. Harvard, meanwhile, is doubling down on its efforts to combat antisemitism, even as it fights off legal challenges from the White House. The university’s next move could set the tone for how other schools respond to similar pressure.
The Trump administration isn’t known for backing down from a fight, and Harvard isn’t likely to start now. For students and faculty, the stakes couldn’t be higher. Federal research funding is the lifeblood of many academic programs, and losing it could have devastating consequences. For Harvard, the bigger issue is principle. The university has made it clear it won’t be bullied into compliance, even if it means fighting the White House in court.
This ruling is a win for Harvard, but the war is far from over. The Trump administration has made it clear it’s not done with its campaign to rein in elite universities, and Harvard is still in its crosshairs.
(Featured image: David Adam Kess)
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
Follow The Mary Sue:
