Nope, James Damore’s Autism Is Not the Cause of His Misogyny

This article is over 6 years old and may contain outdated information

Recommended Videos

[NB: I know that opinion is somewhat mixed about person-first versus identity-first language, and both sides feel very strongly; since I’m not autistic, I don’t get to have an opinion on this, and I’ve therefore switched between the two here to try and acknowledge both.]

Now, let me start off this article by emphasizing something: it’s the author of this Guardian article, not James Damore himself, who makes the harmful suggestion that Damore’s infamous Google memo and subsequent doubling-down are somehow caused by his autism. This is yet another example of the harmful ways that our culture writes about autistic people – and how damaging that narrative can be.

As the author of the article, Paul Lewis, explicitly acknowledges: “[Damore] does not once, however, use his autism to excuse his actions.” Cool. It’s almost like regressive political beliefs and autism aren’t actually linked …

But nope! That didn’t stop Lewis from pathologizing him. He also wrote that Damore “opened up about an autism diagnosis that may in part explain the difficulties he experienced with his memo.” This suggestion stands in direct opposition to Damore’s own understanding of what happened, and it frames autism as some sort of basic decency deficiency, rather than a neurological condition shared by millions of people.

Autistic people are not more likely to brandish sexist pseudoscience on MRA YouTube channels after someone calls them out for their bigotry, and that suggestion is just strange. It’s like saying Caitlyn Jenner’s Republican politics are “in part explained by” the fact that she’s trans, or that my irrational phobia of bees is “in part explained by” the fact that I’m bi. Both are part of a person’s identity, but there is no causal relationship. I personally know dozens of autistic people, and none of them have sent me 10-page memos about my biological inferiority and then doubled down on those assertions. When my autistic friends have hurt me and I told them, they apologized and didn’t do it again. Shocking, I know.

This whole article is peppered with weird suggestions like this, suggestions which detract from an otherwise interesting piece. Lewis also quotes another former Google employee on the autism spectrum, who was “fired last year in the wake of a dispute with a female colleague” after previously being reprimanded when he “queried the use of non-binary pronouns during the [LGBT rights] meeting and bluntly questioned whether gender is on a spectrum.” As a result, this employee “alleges his dismissal is explained by Google’s failure to understand how autism causes him to talk or act in ways that others misinterpret.”

Why is the only other person with autism mentioned in this article also someone who has a problem with women? Like, what is this supposed to tell me?

Now, all these weird suggestions that autism and misogyny/bigotry are somehow tied (as if autistic feminists didn’t exist) do unfortunately detract from one of the article’s great points. Having worked at a number of companies large and small, I can at least anecdotally confirm that their diversity training rarely includes a discussion of neurodiversity, and when it does, it’s not particularly empathetic or helpful. Many managers struggle to provide helpful feedback and a safe working environment for neurodiverse employees, and everything from office layouts to team bonding activities is not designed inclusively. (For instance, I’ve lost count of how many friends with ADHD have complained to me about the stress of working in an open-office plan, or how many autistic friends have complained about overcrowded, loud meeting rooms.) Many corporate cultures are plainly designed for neurotypical extroverts and no one else – and that should change. I really do think Lewis meant well in pointing that out.

But the other thing that should change? The way the media scapegoats autism as a source of anti-social behavior. Jennifer Unkle shared an excellent thread about this issue on Twitter, which I encourage you all to read in full, but I’ve included some highlights below.

As I mentioned above, I do think this framing is a problem with the author of the article, so Unkle’s tweets are a little unfair to Damore. But I also think that she sharply outlines the harm that articles like this can do. They reinforce outdated and oppressive ideas about what autistic people are like, ideas which make it harder for them to find work and acceptance, while also giving bigoted people an excuse for their hate.

No, thanks.

(Via The Guardian; image via Shutterstock)

Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!

The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

The Mary Sue is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy