Photographer received contract she claimed was updated without her consent, then she read what wasn’t guaranteed: ‘My entire contract was changed’

A wedding photographer says a bride sent back a revised contract that would hand the couple her copyright and drop meals for her and her assistants. In a TikTok video, she reads parts of the new version aloud and says “my entire contract was changed.”

Text on the video calls it a reaction to a bride’s revised contract and states “A contract protects you and your business.” The text adds that a wedding contract should not be altered, rewritten or added to without prior discussion. She reads that the edited photos and USB are due 30 days from the wedding date. Communication after booking can become a conflict, as one bride claimed when her North Carolina photographer stopped responding after she paid in full.

She also reads that the booking retainer cannot be refunded once it is signed. Refunds have been a flashpoint for photographers before, as when one refused a divorced bride’s refund. The couple would have no duty to feed her or her assistants, and she would cover her own travel, which is built into the price. She says she is always on time and adds “I don’t think I’ve ever been late.”

She objects to the rescheduling and copyright terms

The revised version lets the bride approve or reject a substitute photographer. When the wedding moves, it lets payments shift to a new date when both sides agree in writing, with no fee unless the bride signs off on one. She says the date would be “locked,” so a cancellation or change within 30 days could leave it unbooked, and she “could have like booked somebody.”

She reads that, once she is paid in full, she would assign the couple the transferable copyright in the final edited photos. The couple could then print, edit, publish and distribute the images for private or commercial use without paying more or asking permission. She reads that she could use them in her portfolio only if the bride approves in writing first.

She says she will not share the couple’s photos if they do not want her to, but she objects to them editing and distributing the images. She says she does not want to be named as the photographer of images someone else altered. The rewrite “makes me feel uneasy,” she says, and she adds that if she is photographing a wedding, “you’re feeding me.” All details are based on her TikTok video.

Vendors who work most of a wedding day should be fed, according to The Knot. It states that most vendor contracts include a “vendor meal required” clause and that meals can cost roughly $30 to $90 per person.

The U.S. Copyright Office states that the person who takes a photograph is generally its author and initial copyright owner, with an exception for work made for hire.

Have a tip we should know? [email protected]