Google Opens the Floodgates of Human Input with Editors’ Picks

Recommended Videos

A small percentage of those of you searching Google may come across a new feature with a mysterious name: Editors’ Picks. But wait? Google’s run by computers and robots, right? Or at the very least the organization has been commited to providing its user with an unbiased, computer-driven search algorithm. At launch, every Google page proudly displayed this message: “This page was generated entirely by computer algorithms without human editors. No humans were harmed or even used in the creation of this page.” Well, apparently it’s time to give searchers the option of widening their horizons, seeing what actual editors, who are (usually) human beings and not computers, think people should be reading.

But really, this was almost inevitable. Google experiments more than a college student who had an overly sheltered home life in high school, as confirmed by the organization’s official release on the new feature:

“At Google, we run anywhere from 50 to 200 experiments at any given time on our websites all over the world. Right now, we are running a very small experiment in Google News called Editors’ Picks. For this limited test, we’re allowing a small set of publishers to promote their original news articles through the Editors’ Picks section.”

Editors’ Picks give the editors responsible for choosing the content from their respective publication complete autonomy over the content they choose. They can post the quirky stories that searches are less likely to find, or the big news that everyone is reading and you should too. The links are not “sponsored” in any way, and the publishers are not paying for this service.

This isn’t the first time a site has decided that maybe a little human input could spruce things up a little. Right now there are very few publications involved and very few users who will actually see the Editors’ Picks box, so it’s still very much experimental. Google is working to improve its whole system, and a lot of that is news-centric. With Editors’ Picks, Google is taking a big leap of faith from its original mission, but it’s one that could pay off well, assuming those pesky editors make the right picks.

(Via Nieman via Poynter)


The Mary Sue is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more
related content
Read Article ‘Mamma Mia!’ Star Sara Poyzer Says a BBC Production Replaced Her With AI
Sara Poyzer performs at the Magic at the Musicals event in 2019
Read Article In Moment of Unbelievable Irony, Midjourney Accuses Stability AI of Image Theft
Spider-Man pointing at another Spider-Man, who is pointing back.
Read Article Elon Musk May Be the Lesser of Two Evils in This Legal Battle With OpenAI
Elon Musk at the 2022 Met Gala
Read Article A.I. Scammers Are Impersonating Real Authors to Sell Fake Books
A robotic hand holds a pencil.
Read Article Sexist Trolls Drive Away Twitch’s Top Female Streamer After 10 Years
Imane "Pokimane" Anys at the 2023 Green Carpet Fashion Awards
Related Content
Read Article ‘Mamma Mia!’ Star Sara Poyzer Says a BBC Production Replaced Her With AI
Sara Poyzer performs at the Magic at the Musicals event in 2019
Read Article In Moment of Unbelievable Irony, Midjourney Accuses Stability AI of Image Theft
Spider-Man pointing at another Spider-Man, who is pointing back.
Read Article Elon Musk May Be the Lesser of Two Evils in This Legal Battle With OpenAI
Elon Musk at the 2022 Met Gala
Read Article A.I. Scammers Are Impersonating Real Authors to Sell Fake Books
A robotic hand holds a pencil.
Read Article Sexist Trolls Drive Away Twitch’s Top Female Streamer After 10 Years
Imane "Pokimane" Anys at the 2023 Green Carpet Fashion Awards
Author