So we’re just saying the quiet part out loud now? Pam Bondi says U.S. citizenship isn’t a ‘right’
Not-so-hidden agenda.
U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi is currently facing a ton of backlash, especially from Fox viewers, after she flat-out claimed that being an American citizen is a “privilege,” not a “right.” That’s a pretty big statement, and it’s definitely raising some eyebrows because it flies in the face of established constitutional law.
According to The Mirror US, Bondi made these rather controversial remarks during a panel appearance on Fox News this past Friday. She really went for it, stating, “Being a citizen in our country is a privilege, not a right. And Donald Trump is going to have everyone in this country who deserves to be here, who is a citizen.” This statement didn’t sit well with a lot of people, and for good reason.
Here’s the thing: Bondi might disagree but claims are factually incorrect. The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution pretty clearly establishes birthright citizenship. If you’re born or naturalized in the United States, that automatically makes you a citizen. This applies to anyone born in the 50 states or most U.S. territories. It’s not something that can be granted or revoked at someone’s discretion; it’s a constitutional right, plain and simple.
It’s really something when the Attorney General needs a lesson on the Constitution
Naturally, social media lit up with reactions. People were quick to point out the obvious constitutional flaw. One user on X put it really clearly, saying, “Calling citizenship a ‘privilege’ kinda/sorta/definitely ignores how the Constitution works. If you’re a citizen, that’s a protected right – full stop, not something a president gets to hand out or take away based on who they think ‘deserves’ it.” Another person on X simply stated, “It’s literally a right under the 14th Amendment.”
The implications of Bondi’s words are also making people nervous. One user directly questioned the potential for overreach, asking, “So… are they saying they can just take the citizenship away from everyone they judge not deserving of it?” Some even joked about turning the tables, with one user quipping, “I guess we can revoke Bondi’s citizenship during the next administration.”
Others took a more direct approach, challenging the administration to put their money where their mouth is if they truly want to change how citizenship works. “Being born in America literally grants you the RIGHT of American citizenship, per the Fourteenth Amendment, dummy. Don’t like it? Amend it,” one commenter wrote, throwing down the gauntlet. Another user dramatically noted, “The US Constitution would like a word as the Founding Fathers roll over…”
This isn’t an isolated incident, either. Trump has been pretty vocal about his desire to end birthright citizenship since the start of his second term. He’s particularly focused on children born to migrants who are either in the country without authorization or on temporary visas.
On his very first day in office, Trump issued Executive Order 14156, titled “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship.” This order aimed to end birthright citizenship for these groups, arguing that the 14th Amendment “has always excluded from birthright citizenship persons who were born in the United States but not ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof.’”
However, these executive orders didn’t go unchallenged. They faced immediate legal pushback, with several federal judges across the country blocking their implementation right after they were signed, ruling them unconstitutional. While the Supreme Court did rule in June 2025 that district courts couldn’t authorize nationwide injunctions of the executive order, the underlying legal battle over birthright citizenship and the 14th Amendment is clearly far from over.
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
