Skip to main content

Nuking Hurricanes Is a Shockingly Stupid Idea, Even by Donald Trump Standards

This is how we're all gonna die, isn't it?

Donald Trump gives a weird goofy face.

According to Axios, our Very Stable Genius of a President reportedly suggested multiple times to senior Homeland Security and national security officials that we try to stop hurricanes by attacking them with nuclear weapons. It’s like he heard about those people that tried to shoot a hurricane and thought, “I can do one better!”

According to one source who was in the hurricane briefing, Donald Trump said (paraphrasing), “I got it. I got it. Why don’t we nuke them? They start forming off the coast of Africa, as they’re moving across the Atlantic, we drop a bomb inside the eye of the hurricane and it disrupts it. Why can’t we do that?”

The source said that people in the room were thinking, “What the f—? What do we do with this?” but the briefer only said something along the lines of “Sir, we’ll look into that.” Because really, what do you do with that?

It should go without saying, but this is not a good idea.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has been saying this for years. They say that the energy released by a hurricane “is equivalent to a 10-megaton nuclear bomb exploding every 20 minutes” so a nuke is no match for that kind of storm. On top of that, the radioactive fallout “would fairly quickly move with the tradewinds to affect land areas and cause devastating environmental problems.”

Trump denies that he ever suggested nuking hurricanes, and you can tell he’s credible because he did so in the third person, a very normal and confidence-instilling thing to do.

Personally, I believe Axios’ story. Mostly because it’s entirely believable. It’s no more idiotic than the things Trump has said about climate and science in public and on camera.

For example:

See also:

But Trump isn’t the only one coming up with terrible ideas for how to solve Earth’s problems. A group of designers has proposed a submarine that pops out mini-glacier “ice babies” in order to restore some of the ice sheets that have melted due to climate change. An … interesting idea, to be sure, but not the most practical.

One scientist told NBC News this is “like trying to save the sand castle you built at the beach using a dixie cup as the tide comes in.” Plus, there’s the question of how much energy it would take to build and operate a fleet of these subs and how much damage that would cause if fossil fuels are used.

The proposal was tweeted out by a Democratic caucus, praising its ingenuity. It’s not “nuking hurricanes” levels of bad, but it’s a reminder that Trump doesn’t have a monopoly on environmental WTFery.

(image: NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images)

Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!

The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

Filed Under:

Follow The Mary Sue:

Vivian Kane (she/her) has a lot of opinions about a lot of things. Born in San Francisco and radicalized in Los Angeles, she now lives in Kansas City, Missouri with her husband Brock Wilbur and too many cats.