The Blatantly Gendered Slut-Shaming Attacks on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Are as Predictable as They Are Gross
The constant attacks on freshman Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have officially reached a new low.
Fox News and other rightwing voices have long tried to attack her for her opinions, which inevitably, only end up serving as a convincing ad for her policies.
Oh no! They discovered our vast conspiracy to take care of children and save the planet 😂 pic.twitter.com/XYWXmi3Xyk
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) November 14, 2018
They’ve tried attacking her for involvement in working-class Bronx communities, claiming her “image” is fake, as if she hasn’t been open about her family’s struggle to move into a better school district and how that experience shaped her view of economic disparity.
Yep. As everyone knows, I grew up between two worlds + experienced 1st hand how a child’s zip code can shape their destiny.
It was scrubbing those households’ toilets w/ my mother that I saw and breathed income inequality.
I decided to make a difference.
You decide to do this. https://t.co/kMtbGQo8o8
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) December 28, 2018
They’ve tried attacking her clothes, her age, the fact that she danced with friends in college. They’ve attacked her voice, which is a criticism that’s likely familiar to many women. Women’s voices always seem to have some quality–too high-pitched, too shrill, too much vocal fry, too much upspeak–that others deem too egregious to be able to listen to our words.
And now the rightwing media has come at Ocasio-Cortez with another predictably gender-based mode of attack: slut-shaming.
Someone recently posted a picture of a woman vaping in a bathtub with the caption “alexandria ocasio-cortez.instagram.post.9-3-2016” to Reddit. The photo is taken from the woman’s perspective, showing just her legs and feet and her hands holding the vape pen, but her breasts are vaguely visible in her reflection in the faucet in front of her.
Earlier this week, Motherboard ran the story as having been debunked by foot fetishists. Indeed, a political activist and cam model named Sydney Leathers confirmed that she was person in the picture. Leathers was also a major player in Anthony Weiners sexting scandal and subsequent conviction. (That will be relevant later.)
Despite the fact that this years-old photo was quickly and easily proven not to have any connection to Ocasio-Cortez beyond what some Reddit rando wrote as an overlay in MS Paint, the rightwing outlet The Daily Caller, founded and funded by Fox News’ Tucker Carlson, ran an article with the headline, “Here’s The Photo Some People Described As A Nude Selfie of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.”
The daily caller decided to post fake revenge porn because they don’t like AOC’s politics pic.twitter.com/oM4dEM41PY
— Judah Maccabeets🍝 (@AdamSerwer) January 9, 2019
(Update: A Fox News spokesperson asked us to include this correction on a relatively minor point, verbatim, which we think says more about them than it does about us: “Tucker Carlson does not finance The Daily Caller in any way, nor does he have any role whatsoever in its editorial operations. She would have known that if she’d bothered to check.” Cool.)
Yes, some people did describe the photo that way. They were 100% wrong, though, and the Daily Caller’s headline did nothing to indicate that. AOC rightly called the site out for “completely disgusting behavior.”
For those out of the loop, Republicans began to circulate a fake nude photo of me. The @DailyCaller reposted it (!) and refused to indicate it was fake in the title as well.
Completely disgusting behavior from Conservative outlets.
No wonder they defended Kavanaugh so fiercely.
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) January 10, 2019
In response, The Daily Caller said they changed the headline “as soon as editors noticed” it. They changed the headline to read “Anthony Weiner Mistress Stands Up for AOC After Evil Internet Trolls Spread Fake Nude Photo” and offered a correction at the bottom of the article, which may have meant more if this were an isolated incident, rather than one entry in a series of attempted tear-down pieces.
a) this is not an apology
b) you’ve been posting hysteric, misrepresentative articles about me nonstop – many within 24h.
Unsurprising they’re targeting me. https://t.co/LcQuQYWdqk
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) January 10, 2019
The decision to draw attention to Ocasio-Cortez’ sexuality is beyond transparent. It’s similar to the way in which the video of her dancing was edited to exclude her friends, setting her now-solo dance to a porn-ish drum beat rather than the original pop song. By depicting her as a sexual being, they’re trying to delegitimize her political worth.
My general thought on the right’s AOC obsession is that a worldview that sorts women into “hot young dummies” and “power-hungry old hags” is built to systemically disqualify women from real power or agency at every point in their lives.
— Sady Doyle (@sadydoyle) January 8, 2019
None of this is to say that there aren’t valid criticisms one could have for Ocasio-Cortez. But these rightwing media figures aren’t coming after her actual politics. They’re coming after the political power being held by a young woman of color. That terrifies them and they’re attacks are distinctly not just about her, but all women who might find themselves inspired by her.
what they are doing to @AOC is not just designed to shame her. it is designed to shame all young women into thinking they should not/could not run for office—that old videos or pictures or rumors of them would surface, that they could never dress/act/speak unimpeachably enough…
— zoe kazan (@zoeinthecities) January 8, 2019
But try as they might, their tear-downs aren’t working. They edit a video of her dancing and they’re mocked while she’s celebrated. They post a fake nude photo and she remains unshamed.
Sady Doyle wrote a fantastic piece on the “sexualized assault on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez” and other powerful women for Dame Magazine. She writes about how the rules for women have changed.
A woman wearing shoulder pads and a boxy polyester skirt suit is a woman in armor; we’re just too young to remember the war she was fighting.
Men pressured women to look androgynous at work, then they mocked successful women for lacking femininity. So it goes. But for millennial women like Ocasio-Cortez, those workplace rules are as outdated as fax machines. A woman in an office is not strange or exceptional, and dressing up is just a way to appear put together. It’s why women with Ph.D.’s post complicated skin-care routines online—or why Ocasio-Cortez tweets out the brand and shade of her lipstick. Women of her generation haven’t been taught that feminine self-presentation is incompatible with intelligence or seriousness.
Ocasio-Cortez didn’t ask for any of this. She asked to be elected to represent New York’s 14th congressional district and the voters there decided she should. Still, she’s handling all of this other baggage supremely well.
If they want to make an example out of me, I will gladly be one.
Hopefully we can be an example of dedication, courage, and persistence under fire.
Or compassion, thoughtfulness, curiosity, justice, and zeal.
I also hope to be an example of not tolerating nonsense, too. https://t.co/B6GqpHAozw
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) January 9, 2019
(image: Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!
—The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—
Have a tip we should know? email@example.com