Meet the Two Female MIT Physicists Who Helped Ghostbusters Stay as Close to Reality as Possible
Whether you realize it or not, the new Ghostbusters is packed with as many close-to-reality details as humanly possible. This was done thanks to the efforts of the two MIT physicists who served as consultants for the film: Janet Conrad and Lindley Winslow. You can catch their work in all the assorted notes strewn about Yates and Holtzmann’s lab in the university, and even the books in Gilbert’s office. As well, the equations on the whiteboard behind Gilbert early on in the movie are (mostly) all real. Aside from the Paranormal Studies Lab reference, the equations (apparently) tell the story of a failed physics theory called SU(5). What you see on the board was transcribed from some notes given by Winslow. Neat, right?
But the detail doesn’t stop there. Apparently even the papers strewn about their desks were held to a ridiculous amount of detail. There were grant applications, physics papers, and all sorts of goodies everywhere that I didn’t even realize were floating about until I read about them today.
What’s even funnier is that Conrad took the opportunity to take a poke at string theorists, of all people, by giving Rowan North (the villain) a string theory paper. Said Conrad, “Of course we made the woman a neutrino theorist and the bad guy a string theorist.” Ha ha, take that, string theorists. (Jessica said, with all these advanced science jokes totally going over her head.)
Anyway, you should check out the full story over on WIRED. It’s a fun read, even if you (like me) aren’t an MIT physicist.
—The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—
Have a tip we should know? firstname.lastname@example.org