Mamdani Faces a Grilling From Jon Stewart Over His Vow to Enforce ICC Warrants, but the Mayor Is Holding Firm on His Legal Strategy
Eyes on the prize.

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani is standing firm on his vow to enforce International Criminal Court (ICC) warrants, even after a pointed grilling from Jon Stewart on The Weekly Show. According to Mediaite, during the July 22, 2026, episode, Stewart pressed Mamdani on whether his public stance on arresting Benjamin Netanyahu was overshadowing other mayoral priorities. Mamdani insisted that honoring ICC warrants isn’t just a legal obligation but a moral one.
Stewart kicked off the conversation by asking if the Netanyahu controversy was becoming a distraction. “Is it taking up a little bit more of the media space than you realized?” he asked. Mamdani pushed back, arguing that the focus should remain on the work while still addressing the questions head-on. “I think the focus always has to be on the work that you’re doing and how you find a balance between not giving your kind of a classic political deflection,” he said.
When Stewart joked about having a list of other leaders he’d like to see arrested, Mamdani didn’t miss a beat. “Anybody who the ICC has called for,” he replied. “I think we should be honoring.”
This isn’t the first time Mamdani has taken a hard line on Netanyahu
In October 2025, during his mayoral campaign, he pledged to do “whatever the law allows” to arrest the Israeli Prime Minister if he set foot in New York City. The ICC issued its arrest warrant for Netanyahu in 2024, accusing him of war crimes and crimes against humanity, including starvation as a method of warfare and persecution. Mamdani has repeatedly called Netanyahu a war criminal, telling The New York Times last week that the PM “belongs in The Hague.”
But here’s the catch – Mamdani doesn’t actually have the legal authority to make an arrest. According to The Guardian, in a video statement, he acknowledged that his administration lacks the power to enforce the ICC warrant. “It is clear that we do not have the independent legal authority to enforce this warrant,” he said.
Instead, he’s shifting the responsibility to the federal government, urging them to join the ICC and execute the warrant. “The federal government, however, does. And I call on them to join the ICC and execute this warrant,” he told reporters at a press conference on the same day. That’s a tall order, especially since the U.S. isn’t a member of the ICC and has long opposed the court. The current administration has made it clear they won’t be enforcing any warrants.
Earlier this week, the president dismissed the idea outright in a Truth Social post, calling Netanyahu a leader “fighting against the Islamic Republic of Iran” and insisting he “will not be arrested” on U.S. soil. Netanyahu himself has brushed off Mamdani’s threats, with his office calling the mayor’s statements an attempt to “divert public attention from his follies.”
Mamdani’s stance has drawn sharp criticism from pro-Israel officials
Senator John Fetterman called him a “clown” who should “sit down,” while Jonathan Harounoff, Israel’s former international spokesperson at the UN, accused him of “political theater.” Even some pro-Palestinian advocates have mixed feelings. While a few praised his “moral clarity,” others were disappointed that he walked back his initial promise to pursue an arrest.
Legal experts have weighed in, too. Adil Haque, a legal scholar, defended Mamdani’s approach, arguing that the mayor is doing what any city leader should do when an indicted war criminal plans to visit. “He is exploring every legal avenue and exhausting all legal options,” Haque said. “If his hands are tied, he will use his voice.”
But not everyone agrees. New York State Assemblymember Simcha Eichenstein has called for the state attorney general to review whether Mamdani’s comments violate state law.
The debate over Mamdani’s legal strategy raises bigger questions about the role of local leaders in international justice. The ICC’s warrant for Netanyahu is a formal accusation of war crimes, and Mamdani’s insistence on enforcing it puts him at odds with both federal policy and powerful political figures.
He’s not backing down, though
In his Wednesday press conference, he doubled down on his call for the U.S. to join the ICC, framing it as a matter of conscience. “Israel’s actions in Gaza have offended the morals, the mere humanity of so many New Yorkers,” he said.
For now, Mamdani’s hands are tied. Without federal cooperation, there’s no legal pathway for New York City to arrest Netanyahu if he attends the United Nations General Assembly in September. But that hasn’t stopped the mayor from using his platform to keep the pressure on. Whether it’s a genuine legal strategy or a calculated political move, Mamdani isn’t shying away.
Supporters see Mamdani as a rare voice of moral clarity in a political landscape where few leaders are willing to challenge U.S. policy on Israel. Critics, meanwhile, argue that he’s overstepping his role as a municipal leader and engaging in performative activism. Either way, his stance is forcing a conversation about accountability, international law, and the limits of local power.
Will Mamdani’s calls for federal action have any real impact?
With the current administration firmly opposed to the ICC and no signs of a policy shift, Mamdani’s demands might end up being more symbolic than substantive. But symbols matter in politics. By keeping the focus on Netanyahu’s ICC warrant, Mamdani is ensuring that the debate over war crimes and international justice stays in the public eye, even if the legal path forward remains blocked.
For New Yorkers, the controversy has become a microcosm of the broader national divide over Israel and Palestine. Mamdani’s unapologetic stance reflects the growing frustration among progressive voters who want their leaders to take a stronger stand against perceived injustices.
(Featured image: The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart, Busboy Productions, Paramount Audio/MTV Entertainment Studios)
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]