1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser

I Guess I Can't Argue With That

Science: Fans Really Like the Things They Like

by Jamie Frevele | 11:42 am, July 15th

Share on Tumblr

Apparently, being a gigantic, vocal fan of certain things is not exclusive to humans and is more primitive than we think. Techreport has a post today about studies delving into why some people — “fanboys,” a term I’ll address a bit later — get so darn obsessive over certain things over their alternatives. Like Mac vs. PC, Nintendo vs. Sega, Star Trek vs. Star Wars, Marvel vs. DC, etc. The conclusion? Once we pick something we like, everything else just sucks.

According to Techreport’s research, when people are given a choice between two options that are comparable or equal in quality, they form a serious preference for the thing they ultimately choose. That preference leads them to believe that the rejected option is inferior, even though when they were initially presented with both, they (obviously) had no real preference.

The same behaviors were found in people with anterograde amnesia who are unable to form memories and, therefore, are unable to remember choosing a particular option over another. These people, who were tested alongside subjects with functional memories, were given two pieces of art from which to choose. Because of their condition, they were unable to remember choosing the piece of art. But when asked to choose between the same two pieces at a later time, the amnesiacs still chose the same pieces of art.

Four-year-olds and capuchin monkeys were also given similar tests in which they were asked to choose from stickers and colored M&Ms, respectively, and were also observed to stick with their original preferences. So, yes — humans of all ages and even our primate cousins really like the things they like, and they are not changing their minds about it, damnit!

And our preferences for those things can also become fervent and cause people to say all kinds of stupid things on message boards. This is what Techreport was looking into after happening upon the phenomenon of “fanboys.” First of all, let’s stop using the word “fanboy.” Especially when you cite a study that tested 225 girls. Female fans are also ridiculous, passionate fans of things, we don’t have to tell you that. (You want to get me started on Ghostbusters 2? No, you don’t. No, you don’t.) We’re not mad at you, Techreport. But “fans” will do all of us nicely.

(Techreport)

TAGS: | | | |


  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Kristin-Frederickson/852880113 Kristin Frederickson

    “Because of their condition, they were unable to remember choosing the piece of art. But when asked to choose between the same two pieces at a later time, the amnesiacs still chose the same pieces of art.”

    …maybe they just liked that piece of art better both times? I’m not sure how that proves amnesiacs form exclusive preferences.

  • Jessica Senning

    Kristin – check out this TED talk by Dan Gilbert.  He talks about the amnesiacs and art experiment and how this ‘synthetic happiness’ is part of how your brain works.  It’s very interesting.

    http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/dan_gilbert_asks_why_are_we_happy.html

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Kristin-Frederickson/852880113 Kristin Frederickson

    Will do

  • Caravelle

    I agree with Kristin. I can see how “those two options are of equal quality, so we wouldn’t expect a person to always pick the same one” can be a reasonable assumption, but I’d rather have a more solid control than that before assuming that they picked the same one for a more complicated reason than that they just preferred that one. After all to choose between two equivalent things the brain often constructs differences and a preference hierarchy between them; why assume that this process is random instead of deterministic and depending on the brain’s general tastes ?

    The linked-to blog post says the original study had people rate the two objects before and after they were told to pick one, and their ratings afterwards clearly preferred the object they picked while they hadn’t before. That’s somewhat more convincing already.