Bombshell Epstein document reveals 10 co-conspirators, completely contradicting Kash Patel’s claim that none existed
Newly released FBI emails from 2019 reveal that federal investigators were actively issuing subpoenas to 10 potential Epstein co-conspirators. That record now collides directly with Kash Patel’s sworn Senate testimony. In Sept. 2025, he claimed the Epstein files contained “no credible information” that Epstein trafficked victims to anyone else.
The newly released internal FBI email from July 9, 2019, potentially contradicts sworn testimony given by Kash Patel. The email proves federal agents actively pursued 10 people described as “co-conspirators” in the Jeffrey Epstein sex-trafficking investigation. It details grand jury subpoenas served across multiple states and a coordinated deployment of FBI teams within days of Epstein’s 2019 arrest.
That record now sits uneasily alongside Kash Patel’s Sept. 16, 2025, testimony before the Senate, where he stated under oath that Epstein trafficked women only to himself. Patel also insisted there was “no credible information” indicating otherwise. But the email tells a different story.
According to the document, agents had already identified 10 potential co-conspirators by name or location. Some were even served subpoenas in Florida, New York, Boston, Connecticut, and North Carolina, while others were still being tracked. The message even flags a “wealthy businessman in Ohio” as an active lead. The FBI’s human trafficking unit was not speculating; it was executing.
Patel, however, told senators that the files contained no such evidence. “There is no credible information. None,” he said. “If there were, I would bring the case yesterday.” But grand jury subpoenas are not issued on vibes. They are sought when prosecutors believe there is a sufficient factual basis to compel testimony relevant to a criminal investigation.
While the emails show an active investigation at one point, only Ghislaine Maxwell was ultimately charged. Supporters of Patel thus argue that investigative leads are not proof, and subpoenas do not equal guilt. They also contend Patel relied on case summaries, not raw investigative correspondence. But people are now asking why none of the other 9 were charged.
Users on X suspect that they were protected because of their power and positions, and were not necessarily innocent. One wrote:
The Attorney General at the time—William Barr—answered to Donald Trump, who’d spent years partying with Epstein. He wasn’t about to let his powerful friends face consequences.
Some are even calling for a perjury case against Kash Patel, calling his statement under oath a lie. But as long as Trump is in the White House, we know no criminals in his administration will face any charges.
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
