45 minutes after House Dems slap contempt charges on Pam Bondi for Epstein cover-up, she gets a new date to testify
Finally!

House Democrats just scored a quick win in their push to get answers about the Epstein files. Less than an hour after filing contempt charges against former Attorney General Pam Bondi for dodging a subpoena, Republicans suddenly announced she’ll testify on May 29. The timing is too perfect to ignore.
The Oversight Committee’s top Democrat, Rep. Robert Garcia, made it clear this wasn’t a coincidence. “Just a few minutes ago, we filed official contempt charges against Pam Bondi,” he told reporters at the Capitol on April 29, per ABC News. Moments later, a GOP spokesperson confirmed Bondi’s new deposition date.
Garcia didn’t hold back his reaction. “Clearly, we’re being effective, because it’s interesting how only when we take action and when we actually have to force Republicans to do anything, to call subpoenas, to get in front of our committee that they actually ever do anything,” he said.
Garcia’s message was clear: pressure works
Bondi’s refusal to testify had been a growing headache for the committee. She was originally supposed to appear behind closed doors on April 14, but after President Donald Trump fired her, the Department of Justice claimed her subpoena was no longer valid. That move didn’t sit well with either party.
The former AG’s handling of the Epstein files had already drawn bipartisan criticism, and the Justice Department’s compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act was under fire. Garcia’s contempt resolution was the next logical step. If successful, it would’ve escalated the matter to federal court, where a judge would decide whether Bondi had to comply.
The Congressional Research Service explains that civil contempt is Congress’s way of forcing compliance with a subpoena. It’s not just a symbolic move. It’s a legal tool to compel testimony. The Oversight Committee has used it before.
In January, Republicans voted to hold Bill and Hillary Clinton in criminal contempt, only to drop the effort after the Clintons agreed to testify. The pattern is familiar – subpoenas get ignored until the threat of legal action becomes real.
Bondi’s history with the Epstein files is messy
An ABC News report from April 3 details how her 14-month tenure as Attorney General was marked by frustration, especially over her handling of the case. In February 2025, she made headlines for handing out binders of previously released Epstein files to pro-Trump social media influencers during a White House visit.
Later that month, she told Fox News she had an Epstein “client list” on her desk. The Justice Department and FBI quickly pushed back, saying no such list existed. Bondi walked it back, claiming she was referring to case files, not a literal client list.
The fallout didn’t stop there. When the Justice Department released millions of Epstein files earlier this year, Bondi faced criticism for failing to redact survivors’ identities. Then came the “burn book” scandal.
During a House Judiciary Committee hearing in February, Bondi held up a printout of Democratic Rep. Pramila Jayapal’s search history from the Justice Department’s unredacted files. Jayapal called it “spying” and demanded the department stop tracking lawmakers’ searches. The DOJ defended the practice, saying it logs all searches to protect victim information, but the damage was done. House Speaker Mike Johnson expressed concerns too.
Her combative approach in hearings didn’t help
Bondi repeatedly dodged questions about the Justice Department’s handling of the files, and her prepared attacks on Democratic lawmakers – dubbed a “burn book” by critics – only fueled the fire. The backlash was swift. Apart from Jayapal, several House Democrats criticized her actions and sent a letter demanding the Justice Department stop tracking their searches, and the controversy became another black mark on Bondi’s tenure.
Now, with her deposition scheduled for May 29, the Oversight Committee is moving forward with its investigation. Chairman James Comer has lined up several other witnesses to testify through June, meaning the probe will stretch into the summer. For Garcia and the Democrats, this is a small but significant victory. “When Democrats fight, we win,” the Oversight Democrats account posted on X. “And we won’t stop until we get justice.”
The question now is whether Bondi’s testimony will finally bring some clarity to the Epstein files saga. Given her track record, it’s hard to say. But one thing is certain. Democrats aren’t backing down. If Bondi tries to dodge again, they’ve made it clear they’re ready to escalate.
(Featured image: Gage Skidmore)
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]