Twitter Says We Like the Like Button 6% More Than Faves, but Do We LIKE Like It?

Or maybe people have just been exceptionally good at Twitter.

Recommended Videos

Last week, a thing changed on the Internet, and lots of people had very strong feelings about it. Specifically, Twitter changed its “favorite” button to “like” and changed its star icon to a heart—and people did not like it. Or, at least, long-time Twitter users were thrown off, but Twitter says the change has been helpful overall.

In fact, it’s caused the feature’s use to increase by about 6%:

Meanwhile, people who think everyone should just retweet things they like instead of “liking” them with the button find themselves mysteriously 6% more annoyed this week. Unless everyone suddenly got better at Twitter (one look at Twitter will dispel that notion), the switch seems to have been effective.

The reason behind the change was that “like,” whether due to Facebook’s ubiquity or not, is a more easily understandable action than “favorite.” That’s how Twitter’s senior vice president of product, Kevin Weil, put it at today’s Open Mobile Summit in San Francisco, according to TechCrunch. As someone who’s witnessed Twitter users asking why people “favorite things” and arguments over whether the fave button should even be used at all, “like” seems as good a choice as any.

As for the icon change, which you can totally undo or otherwise mess with if you want, Weil said, “The heart is a universal symbol. It’s a much more inclusive symbol.” I don’t know in what way a heart is a more universal symbol for “good job on this” than a gold star, but … OK. As far as “inclusive,” there are maybe other things Twitter needs to work on in that respect that have little to do with meaningless validation buttons.

(via The Next Web)

—Please make note of The Mary Sue’s general comment policy.—

Do you follow The Mary Sue on Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, Pinterest, & Google +?


The Mary Sue is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more
related content
Read Article Surprising No One, All 3,878 of Elon Musk’s Cybertrucks Are Being Recalled
Elon Musk during a T-Mobile and SpaceX event
Read Article ‘Mamma Mia!’ Star Sara Poyzer Says a BBC Production Replaced Her With AI
Sara Poyzer performs at the Magic at the Musicals event in 2019
Read Article In Moment of Unbelievable Irony, Midjourney Accuses Stability AI of Image Theft
Spider-Man pointing at another Spider-Man, who is pointing back.
Read Article Elon Musk May Be the Lesser of Two Evils in This Legal Battle With OpenAI
Elon Musk at the 2022 Met Gala
Read Article A.I. Scammers Are Impersonating Real Authors to Sell Fake Books
A robotic hand holds a pencil.
Related Content
Read Article Surprising No One, All 3,878 of Elon Musk’s Cybertrucks Are Being Recalled
Elon Musk during a T-Mobile and SpaceX event
Read Article ‘Mamma Mia!’ Star Sara Poyzer Says a BBC Production Replaced Her With AI
Sara Poyzer performs at the Magic at the Musicals event in 2019
Read Article In Moment of Unbelievable Irony, Midjourney Accuses Stability AI of Image Theft
Spider-Man pointing at another Spider-Man, who is pointing back.
Read Article Elon Musk May Be the Lesser of Two Evils in This Legal Battle With OpenAI
Elon Musk at the 2022 Met Gala
Read Article A.I. Scammers Are Impersonating Real Authors to Sell Fake Books
A robotic hand holds a pencil.
Author
Dan Van Winkle
Dan Van Winkle (he) is an editor and manager who has been working in digital media since 2013, first at now-defunct <em>Geekosystem</em> (RIP), and then at <em>The Mary Sue</em> starting in 2014, specializing in gaming, science, and technology. Outside of his professional experience, he has been active in video game modding and development as a hobby for many years. He lives in North Carolina with Lisa Brown (his wife) and Liz Lemon (their dog), both of whom are the best, and you will regret challenging him at <em>Smash Bros.</em>