Apple Trial Reveals They Forced iPod Restore Messages to Delete iTunes Competitors’ Music

Dammit, sad iPod. I trusted you and your "pity me" face.

Recommended Videos

Apple might be all about DRM-free music and free hugs and high fives for everyone or whatever these days, but that wasn’t always the case. In fact, an iPod DRM trial has revealed that they once went so far as to force customers to restore their devices to delete competitors’ music.

During a current trial over California antitrust laws and whether or not Apple’s iTunes DRM policies drove up iPod prices by stifling competition, attorney Patrick Coughlin alleged that Apple specifically removed songs purchased on competing services from users’ iPods. While that will probably be quite enough to legally condemn Apple, the added fact that their chosen method for doing so was by sending a restore error during syncing and forcing users to wipe their devices isn’t going to do them any favors in the PR department, either.

So what did Apple have to say for themselves? The Wall Street Journal reports that the reason for the removal of files was supposedly malware protection. Apple was concerned about hackers, and removing non-Apple files was a way to keep iPods safe. However, Coughlin argued that the restore error system was deliberately designed so that Apple didn’t have to tell users what the problem was before deleting files, so they wouldn’t figure out what was going on.

Meanwhile, Apple security director Augustin Farrugia testified, “We don’t need to give users too much information… We don’t want to confuse users.” Yeah. Much better to just frustrate the heck out of people with restore errors, which are super fun and not at all time-consuming to deal with.

Harmless malware protection? Huge violation of trust? Maybe even… antitrust? (Sorry.) Either way, this trial isn’t looking good for Apple so far.

(via Gizmodo, image via Pedro Vera)

Are you following The Mary Sue on Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, Pinterest, & Google +?


The Mary Sue is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more
related content
Read Article Surprising No One, All 3,878 of Elon Musk’s Cybertrucks Are Being Recalled
Elon Musk during a T-Mobile and SpaceX event
Read Article ‘Mamma Mia!’ Star Sara Poyzer Says a BBC Production Replaced Her With AI
Sara Poyzer performs at the Magic at the Musicals event in 2019
Read Article In Moment of Unbelievable Irony, Midjourney Accuses Stability AI of Image Theft
Spider-Man pointing at another Spider-Man, who is pointing back.
Read Article Elon Musk May Be the Lesser of Two Evils in This Legal Battle With OpenAI
Elon Musk at the 2022 Met Gala
Read Article A.I. Scammers Are Impersonating Real Authors to Sell Fake Books
A robotic hand holds a pencil.
Related Content
Read Article Surprising No One, All 3,878 of Elon Musk’s Cybertrucks Are Being Recalled
Elon Musk during a T-Mobile and SpaceX event
Read Article ‘Mamma Mia!’ Star Sara Poyzer Says a BBC Production Replaced Her With AI
Sara Poyzer performs at the Magic at the Musicals event in 2019
Read Article In Moment of Unbelievable Irony, Midjourney Accuses Stability AI of Image Theft
Spider-Man pointing at another Spider-Man, who is pointing back.
Read Article Elon Musk May Be the Lesser of Two Evils in This Legal Battle With OpenAI
Elon Musk at the 2022 Met Gala
Read Article A.I. Scammers Are Impersonating Real Authors to Sell Fake Books
A robotic hand holds a pencil.
Author
Dan Van Winkle
Dan Van Winkle (he) is an editor and manager who has been working in digital media since 2013, first at now-defunct <em>Geekosystem</em> (RIP), and then at <em>The Mary Sue</em> starting in 2014, specializing in gaming, science, and technology. Outside of his professional experience, he has been active in video game modding and development as a hobby for many years. He lives in North Carolina with Lisa Brown (his wife) and Liz Lemon (their dog), both of whom are the best, and you will regret challenging him at <em>Smash Bros.</em>