‘Been waiting 36 years’: Disability rights advocates cry foul as Trump administration delays school accessibility rules just days before deadline
A ‘mindless and cruel’ move.
The Trump administration just pushed back a major deadline for schools to make their digital content accessible to people with disabilities, and advocates are furious. Public colleges, K-12 schools, and local governments now have an extra year – two, for smaller institutions – to comply with updated federal accessibility guidelines under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
According to NPR, the original deadline was set for this Friday, April 26, 2026, but the Justice Department announced the delay just four days before it was supposed to take effect. The decision means institutions serving 50,000 or more people now have until April 26, 2027, while smaller public entities get until the same date in 2028.
The Department of Justice justified the delay by saying it had “overestimated the capabilities (whether staffing or technology) of covered entities to comply with the rule in the time frames provided.” But disability rights groups aren’t buying it. Corbb O’Connor, president of the National Federation of the Blind of Minnesota, called the move “outrageous” and said, “Yet again, the blind have been told to wait to live on terms of equality.”
This is no minor setback
It’s a delay of a rule that was supposed to finally bring clarity to digital accessibility in schools. The ADA, signed into law in 1990, has long promised equal access for people with disabilities, but until now, it didn’t specify what that actually meant for websites, apps, or digital course materials.
The new regulation, announced in 2024, was designed to fix that by requiring institutions to follow the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. That meant adding transcripts for audio clips, captions for videos, and ensuring PDFs and webpages work with screen readers – tools blind people use to convert visual content into speech.
O’Connor, who is blind and the parent of a blind child, said the delay isn’t just about waiting another year. “We’ve been waiting nearly 36 years since the law that guaranteed these rights, the one that heralded a new era of access, was signed into law.” He pointed out that international web accessibility standards have existed since 1999, yet schools still aren’t required to meet them.
“The certainty, clarity, and timelines within these regulations have a powerful, local impact,” he said. “Within minutes of meeting my son’s elementary school principal for the first time, he knew the April 24, 2026 deadline.”
The Association on Higher Education And Disability (AHEAD), which represents disability resource staff at colleges and universities, ]slammed the delay. Katy Washington, AHEAD’s president, said it had been anticipating “clear and timely guidance that reflects current technologies, instructional models, and student needs.” She said, “Postponing these updates slows critical momentum and leaves institutions without the clarity needed to fully realize equitable access.”
The DOJ’s decision didn’t come out of nowhere
Higher education and K-12 advocacy groups had been pushing for a delay, arguing that the costs and staffing demands of compliance were too steep. Sasha Pudelski of AASA, the School Superintendents Association, said most districts in their survey admitted they’d struggle to pay for the changes. “The scope, pace, and unfunded nature of this requirement reflect a significant disconnect between federal expectations and the fiscal and human capital realities of local school systems,” she said.
But Jennifer Mathis, who helped craft the original rule while at the Justice Department, called the delay “mindless and cruel.” She noted that the rulemaking process had taken 16 years and was incredibly thorough. “The whole point of this particular rule was to create certainty and clarity for everyone,” she said. “To delay the standards now, after all that work, is just baffling.”
While the federal rule is on hold, legal pressure hasn’t stopped
Just this month, Oregon State University agreed to a $475,000 settlement with a blind student and the National Federation of the Blind after failing to provide accessible STEM course materials. GL Estes Wallace, director of OSU’s Disability Access Services, said the university had only one staff member supporting blind and visually impaired students before the settlement.
“OSU took these steps to work collaboratively with NFB to try to come to some solutions and some processes that we all felt served our students the best,” he said. The settlement includes adding new positions, training staff, and investing in technology to ensure course materials are accessible in formats like Braille or audio.
Wallace emphasized the need to tailor support to individual students, especially in complex science courses. “Trying to make sure that we are working with the individual needs of the students, but also navigating the complexities of some of the really challenging science courses that OSU offers, is a really big part of this,” he said.
The delay in the federal rule doesn’t mean schools can ignore accessibility entirely. Lawsuits like OSU’s show that institutions can still be held accountable for failing to provide equal access. But without clear federal guidelines, progress could slow down, leaving students with disabilities in limbo.
(Featured image: COD Newsroom)
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
