comScore
  1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser

Review

Get Hammered!: A Review of ‘Thor’


It’s the beginning of summer 2011, and that can only mean one thing. Marvel is racing to get the public up to speed before their mega-picture The Avengers hits theaters next year, and they’re determined to get us there whether we feel like it or not. One can only marvel (or DC) at the rate with which these installments are being pushed out, and try to hope for the best. There are origin stories to spool out, seeds to be planted, a host of other metaphors to be abused, all in the name of brand reproduction. There is also a slowly building meta story involving S.H.I.E.L.D. and Samuel L. Jackson being fed in low-calorie nibblets at the tail end of every one of these blockbusters. The very thought of how many episodes of high-finish CG, stunt casting choices, and clunky dialogue one would have to endure just to get to the supposed payoff of The Avengers movie was, and is, exhausting.

So it’s a pleasant surprise that THOR is both watchable, and definitively enjoyable.

Once it gets on its legs, the movie is a fast, paceless, dazzling showcase of Silver Age wonderment rendered in the shiniest effects of the modern world. Chris Hemsworth does his part as the arrogant God of Thunder, delivering speaker-shaking war-cries and, eventually, a measured degree of remorse as Thor learns his lesson in humility. The battle scenes are a mythological thrill, as gods clad in geometric armor face off on a snowy world against the frostbite touch of the Ice Giants. What works on the comic page, such as an iconic thrown hammer, doesn’t always work on the screen, but director Kenneth Branagh and his visual coordinators manage to pull off a few neat tricks. The cosmic backdrop of the Aesir’s home base is awash in breathtaking nebulas and crepuscular rays that bathe our heroes as they ride out to the Bifrost across a shimmering translucent bridge. In addition to the worthwhile look and feel, THOR packs some solid moments of comedy from a few different sources, most noticeably when the newly Earthbound Thor must contend with the tribulations of a regular mortal’s day.

SPOILERS AHEAD

For all the lofty material available, it’s surprising that Branagh was not more daring in his choices. He certainly knows how to play out the familial drama inherent in a pantheon of gods, allowing the fundamental conflicts of parents and sons to give weight to the necessarily flashy proceedings. Perhaps, as is often the case with comic book adaptations, there were concerns about pleasing a historically unpleasable fanbase. (Who, us? Surely not!) Certain concessions are made in the name of cinematic expediency, leading to clumsy editing and even clumsier expository vocalizations. The latter includes such fine script gems as two minutes into the proceedings, when Natalie Portman proclaims “I’m an astrophysicist!” No one was expecting Shakespeare, but with a Bard veteran at the helm, one might be forgiven for expecting a little bit more.

THOR has a big problem twining around its core, like Jormungand around the base of the World Tree, and that is a primary villain whose story and motivations are far more compelling than those of its titular character. As Loki, Norse trickster and brother to this incarnation of Thor, Tom Hiddleston has some meaty material to bite into, and bite he does, with relish. Given the heavy themes of paternal betrayal, royal sibling rivalry, and conflicted loyalty, Hiddleston’s expressive portrayal temporarily overshadows the main event. It’s true that Hollywood has, for some time now, been nursing a chronic case of sympathy for the devil. Such an ailment is out of place here, as THOR is not a root-for-the-underdog tale, but the redeeming story of a humbled hero. As a result, this reviewer found herself rooting for the wrong (or, perhaps, wronged) side. Clearly, the only thing left for the spec screenwriters to do was to muddle Loki’s intentions and methods, leading to some final-act confusion and a hasty re-positioning of audience compassion. Grey moral ground is not a problem. In fact, it should be welcomed from the unexpected quarter of a summer tentpole flick.  Feeling little sympathy or interest for your protagonist until halfway through the movie is, however, a serious problem. The movie’s called THOR, not LOKI, but you could have had me fooled for the first sixty minutes.

THOR boasts four main female speaking roles, two mortals and two shimmering immortals, a glut for the kind of movie where a token girl or older woman is usually all that can be expected. (The film passes the oft-lauded Bechdel Test twice over, mitigated only if one extends “about a guy” to said guy’s interdimensional bridge and resulting electron particle storm.) Jaimie Alexander, profiled elsewhere on this site, is the formidable Sif, one of Thor’s gang of ass-kicking Asgardian warriors. Rene Russo gets little screentime as Odin’s wife Frigga, but manages to get a good hit in with a sword as her king lies unconscious during an attack on their home realm. Kat Dennings hams up her adorable college student’s part, and she’s a bubbly, believable research assistant bummed out that the government’s men in black confiscated her iPod along with more volatile data.

Of course, I have yet to mention THOR‘s leading lady, recent Oscar-winner Natalie Portman. Truth be told, I didn’t want to mention Ms. Portman at all. I don’t want to recall the painful minutes I had to watch her onscreen, phoning in a baffling performance as love interest and loudly self-proclaiming astrophysicist Jane Foster. What kind of astrophysicist, after all, stumbles over saying every remotely scientific phrase? It’s as though she can’t believe she’s saying “Einstein-Rosen Bridge”, either. Empty, and empty-headed, is the character who ceases to function as soon as a hunky, potentially insane stranger crosses their paths. At film’s end, I finally sided with a thunder god torn from his mortal love, but I was just as grateful for the break from her presence.

So, by the mighty hammer of Thor, spend a couple of hours traveling the digitally matte-painted cosmos with Hemsworth & Co. You’ll laugh, you’ll plug your ears, and you’ll question that winged helmet. For a franchise installment, you could probably do better, but you could do a whole lot worse.

TAGS: | | | | | |


  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Chemise-Rogers/39609427 Chemise Rogers

    Oh good! I’m not the only one who felt that Portman’s portrayal was lacking. It just didn’t feel right. I don’t know it if was her or the way the part was written but she didn’t seem like a passionate scientist to me.

  • http://hoydenabouttown.com/ tigtog

    “the oft-lauded Bechdel Test” is only lauded because it’s such a clear illustration of exactly how low you can make a bar for a modicum of reality with female characterisation on film and still have Hollywood fail to get over it.

    A film that passes the Bechdel-Wallace test by forcing unrealistic dialogue between two female characters is still a film that is portraying women inadequately and disrespectfully. From your description it sounds like that’s all the filmmakers have managed (twice! ooh): to shoehorn a conversation that doesn’t flow naturally from the characterisation just to score a few Bechdel points. It’s still sounds like the women are primarily just decoration and approval-givers, yet again. Yay.

    (I’ll probably still see it because I’m a sucker for action films, and this one does sound generally like a lot of fun. But I’m not expecting to be thrilled by the portrayal of women just because Sif and Frigga kick arse (as they should) and they managed to kludge together two Bechdel-Wallace moments. I’m going to see it despite the limited views of women.)

  • guest

    I was also annoyed by Natalie Portman’s character. Not only was she lacking in character, i was also annoyed by the immediate latching onto her of Thor. Really guy? You have other things to worry about, please keep the love interest storyline OUT.

  • guest

    “by” thor.

  • Serenitystowaway

    Just saw it, and I thought it was a lot of fun…it was also my first time watching 3D since I was a kid with cardboard glasses, and I’m not sure about the technology yet. I’m sure you get used to it, but I actually thought the 3D took away froom the action in some places where you might think it would be a boost. The big fight scenes, particularly near the end where we was a lot of hand-to-hand, were almost lost in the 3D…which only means that one day they’re going to get better, and it’ll be AMAZING!

    Favourite part of the whole movie: Loki’s “speech from the throne” about how the population needs stability…Canada just re-elected our PM, who pretty much used Loki’s exact words as his platform for re-election. That got some Canadian inside-joke laughs.

    Also, the previews before the film made my day: Transformers, Green Lantern, Captain America, Harry Potter, Conan…I’m missing some, I think…

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7G4SWUX2MCWWXLMYNN347JMIZY Frodo Baggins

    I mean… it’s Thor. What were you expecting? What we need is more films with central female characters, not forcing the square peg of adapting male-oriented source material into the round hole of female empowerment.

    For the record, I thought the Bechdel-passing moments in Thor very much flowed from the characterization, but yeah, they were quite limited in the big picture.

X