comScore
  1. Mediaite
  2. Gossip Cop
  3. Geekosystem
  4. Styleite
  5. SportsGrid
  6. The Mary Sue
  7. The Jane Dough
  8. The Braiser

Officially Official

Kristen Bell Will Play the Lead in Disney’s Frozen


Disney‘s The Snow Queen was languishing in development hell for a while until it was finally abandoned in 2010. But just around Christmas, it was announced that the movie had been revived, under a different title, Frozen, with concept art and everything! And things are moving right along for Disney’s Frozen — they’ve found their lead, and it’s Kristen Bell! She will provide both the speaking and singing voice for what is being called the “lead” character. But which character will that be?

Frozen, which will be 3D computer animated, will borrow from a Hans Christian Andersen story about a Snow Queen who cast a spell on a little boy named Kay and kidnaps him, whisking him away to her snow palace. Kay’s best friend, Gerda, then has to go on a journey to find Kay. It’s not clear which character will be considered the lead role in this movie — either the Snow Queen or Gerda. With Bell’s very youthful voice, I’m going to guess that this will be all about Gerda, and that’s the role she will play. Then again, maybe this Snow Queen is just misunderstood, and is not that much older, and Bell will humanize someone we think is a villain.

But this is all just speculation. Don’t quote me on any of this.

Personally, I’m pretty excited to hear Kristen Bell sing for this. She has a background in musical theater and played the hyper-pure Mary Lane in Reefer Madness: The Movie Musical. (Which, if you haven’t seen it, try to get your hands on that as soon as possible. Trust me.) In my opinion, she is perfectly suited for a Disney movie, whether she’s playing a good girl or an evil queen. Did we all see her on Party Down? She can be super intimidating.

But here is Bell in Reefer Madness, as a very, very, very good girl:

Frozen is set to hit theaters November 27, 2013.

(The Hollywood Reporter via Nerd Bastards)

Previously in Frozen

TAGS: | | | |


  • Anonymous

    They should totally work a sloth into the plotline somehow.

    The outtakes would be more fun than the film.

  • http://twitter.com/Oni_Queen Joyce Julia Pasay

    Okay, What is it with Disney and removing all mentions of ‘Princess’ or ‘Queen’ from their titles?  This sounds like ‘Tangled’ all over again! What is so wrong about having a title that sounds feminine? or has the name of the main female character in it? The Past few movies that I’ve seen released or I have seen mentioned from them they changed the original title to something ‘boys would like.’ just like with ‘John Carter’. Can’t mention the Princess in the title, even though she is essential to the plot! Why is this happening?

  • Anonymous

    I’ll lay odds they’re following up on the success of “Enchanted”.  It’s amazing what odd things people will be convinced was the one and only thing that made a particular project a success.  Of course, one bets you’ll hear people maintaining it was the thing they personally were in charge of, but that’s just obvious.

    Back when Legend of the Dark Knight came out, there were people at DC who maintained that the reason it sold so well was the innovative square-bound format, and not the general quality of the work.

  • Anonymous

    I believe it all has to do with the “failure” of ‘The Princess and the Frog.’ Disney, in their infinite wisdom, blamed it’s box office failure not on the fact that it wasn’t a great movie, but that it didn’t appeal more to boys. 

    Here’s a more in depth explanation. http://blog.moviefone.com/2010/03/09/the-real-reason-why-disney-changed-rapunzel-to-tangled/

  • http://twitter.com/Oni_Queen Joyce Julia Pasay

     ’Tangled’, ‘Enchanted’, ‘Frozen.’ are they titles? or are they just throwing random verbs and adjectives out there and hope that will catch people’s attention? Does that mean if they given ‘The Princess and the Frog’ the title ‘Hopping’ they would have gotten more attention for it? Basically what this is telling me is that Disney has given up on proper titles and has been reduced to titling their movies ‘ooh! Shiney!’ to get kids attention.

  • http://roseeclipse.livejournal.com/ Rose Jones

    Pardon my skeptism but I’m not confident that Disney will do one of my favorite fairy tales much credit. They definitely reworked the original ending of “The Little Mermaid” because it wasn’t exactly “happily ever after” when the mermaid hurled herself into the sea. But “The Snow Queen” has a good storyline and nobody dies. I don’t want them to tamper with it too much.

    And I never considered the Snow Queen exactly a standard “bwhahaha” villain, more of a dangerous force of nature that you can’t destroy or defeat but would be lucky to escape from. Will Gerda have to destroy her Icy Majesty before she cuts out Kay’s heart and uses it to boost her magical powers to freeze the earth forever? I hope not.

    Then again if Disney gets “Frozen” then are the rights for the title “The Snow Queen” still up for grabs? Because I’d hand it over to Studio Ghibli and let them bust their chops making a great movie out of it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000500177841 Rachel Banzhaf

    I’ve never particularly liked The Snow Queen – partly due to the cold and partly the meandering journey Gerda takes. I do like that the villain isn’t all that bad, just cold and a bit lonely. I hope it works, since I adore most Disney animated movies.

  • Anonymous

    Quality isn’t inherently tied to how a movie performs, and, in any event, “The Princess and the Frog” got strong reviews.

    It’s simple fact that the movie didn’t attract as much interest among boys as girls; hence, Disney’s marketing campaign for “Tangled” that played to that group, and found much more success (and note that they didn’t have to change the actual content, they just had to trick them into the theatre and they left satisfied).

  • Anonymous

    Damn… while I’m super happy that it’s off the shelf and yay Kristen Bell! , I’m a little ticked that it’s definitely computer animated now.  My only hope is that computer animation will make for totally awesome snow and ice waste lands

  • http://twitter.com/SylviaSybil Sylvia

     I know. The entire fairy tale is about the girl kicking ass, with the assistance of animals and other women, while the boy waits passively to be rescued. You just know Disney is going to RUIN it. They have no idea how to write female characters and The Snow Queen is basically nothing but.

    I would love to see Studio Ghibli’s version of The Snow Queen. They do really well with both strong female leads and moral complexity. You know their version of the little robber girl (my favorite character) would be just amazing.

  • Frodo Baggins

    Past-tense verbs are all the rage with kids these days.

  • Frodo Baggins

    Wasn’t the misleading ad campaign one of the most common complaints about Tangled?

  • http://www.facebook.com/SlyGoddess Alex Slygoddess

    I’m sure it will be beautiful. Tangled was beautiful, even with its badly rendered characters. Anyway, their main 2D animatiors Ron Clements and John Musker are now basically pioneering a hand-drawn adaptation of Discworld, and to me, that’s way more exciting then a 2D Snow Queen.

  • Anonymous

    Ohhh didn’t know about Discworld! That’s awesome!!
    and I loved Tangled, I just have a special place in my heart for hand drawn

  • Anonymous

    It had a very high CinemaScore rating, so audiences who went to see it clearly loved it.

  • Anonymous

    Yes, Disney knows nothing about female leads; that’s why many of their most famous movies, including their last two, featured active female protagonists.

  • http://www.facebook.com/Gorillazfan Emily Hill

    I agree with you on Ghibli hey tend to do stories justice I mean if you look at spirited away sort of a combo the wizard of oz and cinderella in the fact Chihiro ends up in a strange place having to fight a witch to escape and then Haku when he remembers who he is talks about Chihiro’s shoe and how he brought her to shore

  • http://www.facebook.com/Gorillazfan Emily Hill

    I’m wary about this Disney doesn’t do good with girls thats probably why they haven’t done any Baba Yaga stories

  • http://twitter.com/SylviaSybil Sylvia

    If Tangled’s Rapunzel is your standard of “active” female protagonist, then I’m sure you’ll be happy with whatever Disney puts out.

    Personally, I’m hoping they don’t recycle the same tired old “woman needs a man to kick her out of her rut” trope in Frozen that they’ve done with their last several female leads. Gerda is self-reliant and a self-starter in the original fairy tale and Disney better not screw that up.

  • Frodo Baggins

    I don’t doubt it. But I, for one, avoided going to see what appeared to be a sub-Dreamworks hip ‘tude-fest, and I have heard the same sentiment from many others who wound up seeing it on TV months later and being pleasantly surprised.

  • Anonymous

    The prince finding Rapunzel in the tower is kind of the whole point of Rapunzel.

    And I fail to see how Rapunzel doesn’t qualify as active.

X