Back in early high school, one of my music teachers told me this: when you get up to audition in front of a group of peopleĀ for whatever reason, deep down in their heart of hearts, theyĀ want you to succeed. They might look bored and they might hate you as a person, but even so, they’d rather hear you perform well then sit there and watch you suffer. Ā The same holds true with anyĀ criticismāas much as the public loves a snark-filled takedown, not a single reviewer truly enjoys wasting their time watching movies, playing games, or reading books that are not good.
But.Ā But.
Sometimes, after an oft-publicized gaffeĀ that illuminates many of the core problems facing a particular industry āsuch as “we didn’t have time to include playable multiplayer female characters because that’s the ‘reality of production,'”Ā just as an exampleā it’s difficult, at certain moments, to not embrace the teensiest bit of pleasure upon hearing that the final product of all that hemming and hawing and “but it would have been double the animation!” excuse-making didn’t quite make it work.
Indeed, one feels a bit like the dog fromĀ Duck Hunt lookingĀ at all the reports of glitchiness, stagnant storytelling, andāseriouslyāmicrotransations. Like, gee, I wonder what kind of character you could have added to the story of a scruffy European man jumping off of buildings to make it more innovative and interesting? Hmmmm. Such a quandary, that one.
But in all seriousness, the reviews are… well, not much to write home about. KotakuĀ called the game indicative of “creative dead ends the series has wandered into”; both JoystiqĀ and PolygonĀ noted that the drops in framerate ultimately proved incrediblyĀ distracting, with the latter publicationĀ alleging that “its moment-to-moment performance varies between acceptable and abysmal.”Ā EvenĀ IGN, who gave the game the most favorable review we could find, labelled theĀ protagonist a “one-dimensional character whose motivation is little more than the standard revenge tale.”
And that is all, of course, to say nothing of the fact that Ubisoft deliberately embargoed all of these reviews from going up untilĀ after the game wentĀ on sale today, a move that helps Ubisoft at the expense of both the consumer and the reviewer, who must agree to the game manufacturer’s terms in order to get early access for reviewing in the first place (hey, if you’re looking for “ethics” and “corruption,” that might be a good place to start).
All in all, it sort of seems like Ubisoft messed this one upāwhich, honestly, is too bad, even if we didĀ get super annoyed at them this year for all that “women are too hard to animate” nonsense. HopefullyĀ Assassin’s Creed: RogueĀ and ACĀ Chronicles: China,Ā which has an actual honest-to-god female protagonist, will ultimately do better than their much-hyped French Revolution-based counterpart, and then maybe the studio will finally take note and start moving forward with new ways to innovate the same old guy-stabbing-templars storyline. We can hope.
(image viaĀ wavebreakmedia/Shutterstock.com)
Are you following The Mary Sue on Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, Pinterest, & Google +?